Don’t blindly serve WebP format

If you have done any webdev work in last few years, you must have heard about WebP. It’s an image format that promises up to 34% smaller file sizes without noticeable quality downgrade. It’s pretty much universally supported since late 2020.

With smaller file sizes and widespread support, you might think it’s a good idea to just serve all your images in WebP. Or, if you want to be extra backward-compatible - serve WebP to all browsers that claim to support it, and original image to remaining few.

I also thought it’s a good idea, and made a switch on this very website. I’m creating WebP with a compression factor set to 80. And then I noticed that one file is actually larger after conversion.

Following this thread, I compared size of all WebP images with their original counterparts. Turned out WebP produced larger files in 3% (4 out of 117). In worst case, 20 kB PNG file turned into 122 kB WebP - over sixfold increase in size!

Since then, when I generate WebP, I compare file size to original and keep it only if new format produces smaller file. This way browsers will always receive the smallest file I can produce, regardless of the format.

I guess the main takeaway here is ages old “measure before optimizing”.


Comments